Monday, August 23, 2010

More on the Senate race

I just wanted to add a couple more thoughts to the discussion. First, to be totally clear, I think Clint is a good guy and I have nothing against him at all. I think it takes a lot of bravery to throw your hat into the ring of fire. I appreciate his efforts and his belief in America, and his passion.

We must remember that the Left did not get to where they are now - and America with them - in one election. It didn't happen overnight. It took decades. I look at the election in November as the first of many, many, many stops on a map, on a path leading back to individual liberty; personal responsibility and self-governance; fiscal restraint and responsibility; Constitutionally limited government; a real free market economy; and prosperity for all. The journey starts this year, it doesn't end. I think that Dino can help get the journey started. Maybe he won't be the right guy in six years, maybe he will be, but it will be up to us to make that decision at that time. For this election, especially considering that Patty Murray is the other option, it makes a lot of sense to support Dino. And PS - not everyone supporting Rossi is some sort of establishment Republican. Many of us, myself included, have a laundry list of complaints about the Republican Party establishment - believe me - but we each have to make a choice, and so I have done that.

Here's the thing.

All politicians represent a compromise of some sort. Had Clint won the primary, I would be endorsing him even though I don't agree with him 100% of the time. The ultimate question for me is which candidate will be a rubber stamp for things like ObamaCare? Answer: Patty Murray. Which candidate doesn't care about my concerns because she doesn't need my vote anyway? Answer: Patty Murray. Which candidate called us teabaggers? Answer: Patty Murray.

Which candidate has promised to repeal and replace ObamaCare, and has promised to cut spending and reform entitlements? Answer: Dino Rossi.

For the first part of our journey, that's a pretty darn good start, don't you think?

Now, can we stop tearing each other down and get back to defeating the Queen of Pork? Please?

I mean, what headline do you want to wake up to on November 3rd?

Police and Fire Fighters and Teachers, oh my!

By Littlefish

Always, always, always… Police, Fire Fighters, and Teachers. Yep. Those are the things we can’t afford, Police, Fire Fighters and Teachers. They are obviously the biggest waste of taxpayer money to be found. Well, according to the Obama administration’s recent sales pitch. Like Obama says, if the states aren’t bailed out, Police, Fire Fighters and Teachers will have to be fired so fast that your houses will burn down, your property will be vandalized, and your children will be left ignorant in the streets! We must do something now; after all, Police, Fire Fighters, and Teachers will simply have to be cut! It is the only other solution!


How about, instead, we use a little imagination, head into the forest of government spending, bring out an axe, and start chopping some actual dead wood. Let’s look beyond the words of the politicians to the realities of what they are actually trying to protect. Let’s go ahead and keep the Police, Fire Fighters, and Teachers (if we could get their unions out of the picture, that would go a long way toward affordability of services, but I digress), let’s make sure these pillars of society are well funded and vibrantly staffed.

What then shall we cut? To listen to the current administration, you would think we were already to the bone. Hardly. I’ve never once heard a politician say something like:

“Hello, my name is Nancy, and I already have so many millions of dollars that my family can live happily without an income indefinitely. Ya know, instead of me taxing you guys more and cutting Fire, Police and Education funds, maybe, just maybe, I should cut the millions in tax payer funded entitlements my cohorts and I have written into law for ourselves!”

Don’t get me wrong, I’m not talking about limits on wealth, I’m talking about limits on how much politicians can bilk the tax payer for without producing a single thing. Our elected servant’s overspending, over promising, and over paying themselves to do so, must be stopped immediately, and contrary to the current script from the Liar in Chief, we don’t need to cut Fire, Police, and Education to do it, we just need to focus on the ‘over paying themselves’ part. How about some common sense cuts, some of it really basic stuff, like:

1. Any public servant, (except the President of course) when traveling abroad or home to their constituents or across the state for a meeting, anywhere they might fly to, they fly coach. It’s already a rule, it just needs to be enforced and expanded. Or better yet, lets get them on Amtrak or Greyhound. No military transports, no first class. Only the cheapest fare available. Red eye if need be. We are trying to cut spending, right? This won’t solve everything financially, but in the case of politicians, it will give them extra quality time with their constituents, to help them learn of the latest issues facing them. And if coach isn’t safe for them, then they aren’t doing their jobs very well.

Wealthy companies have private jets and limos, their CEO’s use them because they are the bosses. Politicians aren’t the bosses, they are the servants. And the US government is not a wealthy company, it is a broke, penniless non-profit, and its employees need to act like it.

2. Salary caps can be detrimental to social and economic progress when used to constrain private sector wealth accumulation. However, the salaries of elected officials have no link at all to productivity, and therefore can be constrained without concern for a faltering economy, in fact, the more we can constrain their salaries, the better off you’ll be, especially if you work in Fire, Police, or Education, because it seems from their own rhetoric, the current administration is ready to slash the wages of Police, Fire and Education employees at a moments notice, indeed, it seems to be the only idea they have for cutting anything.

Let us remind them, that it is actually their salaries that are the least beneficial to society as a whole, and put them in line with general administrative salaries in the private sector. Or better yet, no politician shall make a yearly salary greater than the median income of their district, or how about, equivalent to the Police, Fire Fighters and Teachers of that district? Just a starting point.

The extension of that of course would be capping any politician’s tax payer funded retirement accounts as well. Maybe a graduated scale based on personal wealth of the politician in question would be more affordable. There is no reason on earth people like John Kerry, with his near Billion dollar fortune needs to suckle the government teat in retirement. He can invest and earn all his own money that he wants, but the golden parachute must go. We have income limits on other tax payer provided funds, like housing and food stamps, why not on politician’s tax payer funded pensions?

3. Eliminate all government motor pools and tax payer provided ground transportation for all politicians and public employees except for the President and Governors, and job specific vehicles like bucket trucks, back hoes, and police cars. Anyone else, from the Senate Majority Leader to the county tax assessor can drive their own cars and write off the mileage like everyone else. Or better yet, bus passes. Let’s get our public servants on public transportation. First of all, selling off all those vehicles should bring in a little seed money.

And while we’re at it, let’s eliminate free parking for public servants. When attending a rally at the capitol, attendees will know, the legislators park free but the constituents pay! No more free parking. If they can’t afford it on their new salary then they can take the bus, like everyone else who can’t afford parking. The garages can then be opened up to for-profit parking enterprises, at least to cover maintenance costs, maybe even fund a Teacher’s job or two.

4. What about Catering? The piles of sandwiches and bottles of water that stack up around government offices can be priced in the millions. Bring a sack lunch, servant! The rest of us do when we have to. No person in their right mind would forego necessary expenses, (rent, insurance, heating, or maybe, police, fire, education) just so they can maintain catered luncheons with their associates. How come legislators don’t have that kind of common sense? Oh yea, it’s not their money, maybe that’s why. And it isn’t so scary to get on TV and beg for higher taxes so you can keep your cupcakes.

5. Travel less. This goes for all government workers and public servants, but, this one is fresh for me because we just watched the Rock Star in Chief completely clog the city of Seattle with closed streets and no fly zones so his dozens of armored support vehicles could race him to the proper street corner to pimp his girl here in Washington. Mr. President, instead of bellowing fires of fear about global warming and painful cuts in public services, all the while gallivanting around the country trying to convince us your plans are working, how about you just teach the public with your actions, not with your unbelievable words. In other words, Mr. President, just get to work, and stop campaigning. Maybe that could save some Police jobs.

How much does it cost to fly that mini-army around the country several times a day? Even without the motorcade, at over $50k per hour, just 12 hours of flight on AF1 is another dozen years of decent salary for some unlucky Fire Fighter. I know that police, fire, and education is a state and local issue, not a federal issue, but President Obama seems adamant that there is some financial difference between state funds and federal funds. Somebody should tell him that all the money comes from the same place, the tax payers.

How about, as you pointed out yourself Mr. President, since the country is so broke that we have to fire our Police, Fire Fighters and Teachers, maybe you could stay home sometimes, in that beautiful house we provide for you, and broadcast your message over the TV. No military transport, no tons of carbon footprint, no small businesses losing business during the day because no one can get to their shop while you cruise 2nd avenue. Ridiculous. Of course, I understand fully the need for heavy armaments around world leaders in a diverse society, which is exactly why less travel is prudent.

I recognize these simple cuts aren’t going to solve our deficit issues alone, but Police, Fire Fighters, and Educators are key factors to a smooth running society. Why would any honest politician suggest cutting those first when there is still so much fat on the bone? Here in Washington State, to overcome our nearly $3 Billion state deficit, the Evergreen Freedom Foundation, has put together a list of state specific cuts that could be made, instead of the perennial political trump cards of Police, Fire Fighters and Teachers. Some of these might work in your state, might not. The point is to flush these tax leeches out into the open so we can deal with them plainly.

And remember, the only way to know if a politician is lying, is to check to see if their lips are moving. The next time any elected servant of the public tries to sell some BS about cutting public services, ask them if they mean their own job first? Logically, if a legislator’s job is to manage and delegate funds for public services, and by their own admission public services need to be cut, it is clear that they haven’t been doing their jobs; therefore, which public service jobs need to be cut first is easy to ordain, the politicians themselves.

Thanks for playing.


Tea Party Activists Endorse Dino Rossi

The following is the text of a letter signed by Tea Party activists from around the state, endorsing Dino Rossi for U.S. Senate in the general election, and urging unity in support of his campaign:

Monday August 23, 2010

Tea Party Activists Endorse Dino Rossi

In the race for U.S. Senate in the state of Washington, the choice is clear. We support Dino Rossi against the incumbent Democrat Patty Murray.

In the primary, some of us voted for Paul Akers or Clint Didier, and some of us voted for Dino Rossi. But we are now all united in supporting the election of Dino Rossi.

Patty Murray has been in office for 18 years - it's way past time for her to receive a pink slip. Dino Rossi offers a sharp contrast to the tax and spend policies supported by Patty Murray. And, in 2010, Patty Murray (who ranks #4 in the Democratic Senate leadership) is more vulnerable than ever.

Dino Rossi is for repealing Obamacare, and replacing it with common-sense proposals "that give power to patients and doctors not government and insurance companies" and that"will actually lower health insurance costs, improve access to a greater variety of health insurance plans, and give people choice in picking their doctors."

Dino Rossi says:

"Our national debt topped $13 trillion this year. If Congress keeps spending your money at this unprecedented pace, our national debt will reach $19.6 trillion by 2015. Both Republicans and Democrats are guilty of running up our nation's credit card without considering how they're going to pay the bill. Congress is putting our economic future in jeopardy by continuing to spend money they don't have. Washington families have to make tough budget decisions every day to live within their means, and it's time for Congress to do the same."

Dino Rossi has signed the Americans for Tax Reform Taxpayer Protection Pledge, and he has signed the grassroots Contract From America. He has been endorsed by Senator Tom Coburn and Senator Jim DeMint, two of the most fiscally conservative members of the U.S. Senate.

Those of us who supported other candidates in the primary are, of course, disappointed that our favorite candidate did not make it past to the general election. But we unite to support Dino Rossi as absolutely superior in comparison to Patty Murray - even though he may not have been our initial favorite.

None of us (even those of us who supported Dino Rossi in the primary) necessarily agree with him on every issue. After all, we don't necessarily agree with each other on everything either!

In a way, that is the most important point. We are Tea Party activists, advocates of liberty and defenders of the U.S. Constitution. We are committed to repeal of Obamacare, limited government, lower taxes, and reduced spending - but we don't always agree with each other on every issue.

We've united together in Tea Party rallies and townhall protests. We've marched together in the nation's capital. We've worked together to repeal and replace Obamacare.

Now, we join forces to repeal and replace Patty Murray, and to elect Dino Rossi as our next U.S. Senator. We urge you to join us!

(*) personal endorsement only; organization listed for identification purposes only

Keli Carender ("Liberty Belle"), Seattle -; organizer, February 2009 Presidents' Day Porkulus Protest; Seattle Sons and Daughters of Liberty(*)

Jeremy Jasman, Bellingham - State Chair for Washington State Young Republicans(*); President of Whatcom County Young Republicans(*); volunteer organizer for Akers campaign

Dave Kasold, Bothell - King County Tea Party activist; national Tea Party newsletter editor; supported Didier in primary

Dan Michael, Woodinville - volunteer for Coday Senate campaign; organizer, Puget Sound Conservative Underground(*)

Melissa Milam, Kennewick - supported Didier in primary; Tea Party activist

Sally Oljar, Seattle - Co-Coordinator, Seattle Sons and Daughters of Liberty(*); National Coordinator, Tea Party Patriots(*)

Jeff Patton, Shoreline - volunteer for Coday Senate campaign; organizer, Shoreline Caucus(*)

Pat Tarzwell, Shelton - Assistant State Director, (Patriotic Resistance)(*)

Steve Beren, Seattle - former campaign manager of Coday Senate campaign; Tea Party activist

(*) personal endorsement only; organization listed for identification purposes only

Cross-posted at Red County


Adding on a little extra from me, personally. I think it was Mark Levin who wrote (I'm paraphrasing here): If the compromise moves you toward liberty, freedom and prosperity for all, then it's a good compromise. If it moves you away from those goals, it's a bad compromise.

People may feel like Dino isn't perfect, but I most definitely think he will move us in the direction we want to go, whereas a Patty Murray victory will result in another giant step backward away from our goals of liberty and prosperity for all. She's already shown her true colors - a far leftist who has no interest in hearing from those with whom she disagrees. Patty Murray is an ideologue and Dino Rossi is a businessman who will help us get our fiscal house in order.

I sincerely hope that Didier's supporters will see that this "compromise" moves us closer to our goals and that sitting out the election all but assures a Murray win.